The spike in nitrogen fertilizer prices over the past month has prompted many growers to think about switching more acres to soybean in 2026. The high nitrogen fertilizer prices are squeezing the potential profitability of any crop requiring nitrogen fertilizer, such as corn, dry bean, canola, or wheat. The symbiotic nitrogen fixing behavior of soybean is an impressive feat of nature that helps reduce nitrogen fertilizer expenses in farm budgets.
If you do plan to plant more soybean acres in 2026, remember that soybean still has its own crop nutrient needs and removal, like phosphorus and potassium, that cannot be ignored for the soybean crop or across the crop rotation. In addition, iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a common problem in soybean fields across the region, and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) can debilitate and cripple soybean yield now and into the future.
Before you plant soybean on any acre, it is important to have current soil test information for IDC and SCN. These two problems are best managed with the right soybean variety, and there is a nice window before spring planting to collect soil samples.
Soybean Fertility (Phosphorus and Potassium)
Soybean does not respond to phosphorus as dramatically as grass crops like corn or wheat do. Nevertheless, medium to high soil test P is required to achieve good soybean yields. Soybean responds to broadcast P placement better than seed-placed P or sideband P. In no-till regions where soybean is often planted with air drills, seed-placed P or sideband P is often the only opportunity to apply phosphorus in the system. You must pay special attention to seed-placed fertilizer safety with soybean.
Soybean removes far more potassium in harvested seed than canola or wheat. Soybean yielding 50 bu/acre removes about 60 lb/acre K2O, while wheat yielding 80 bu/acre removes only 25 lb/acre K2O. Pay close attention to potassium removal across the crop rotation. After soybean is added to the crop rotation, cumulative crop K removal over numerous years increases greatly, and declining soil test K is observed over time.
Do not place potassium fertilizer with soybean seed; delayed seedling emergence and reduced plant population can occur. Any potassium fertilizer should be broadcasted or banded away from seed.
Soybean Iron Deficiency Chlorosis (IDC)
Soybean is very susceptible to iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC). Soybean IDC is not caused by low soil iron but instead by soil conditions that decrease iron availability and uptake by soybean roots. Soybean IDC risk and severity are primarily related to soil carbonate content (calcium carbonate equivalent, CCE) and worsened by salinity (electrical conductivity, EC). These primary risk factors (carbonate and salinity) can be measured with routine soil testing.
Soybean IDC is common in the upper Midwest, northern Great Plains, and Canadian Prairies, where soils frequently have high carbonate and/or salinity. Within a field, IDC symptoms are usually confined to soybean IDC hotspots with high carbonate and salinity; however, symptoms may appear across a field if high carbonate and salinity are present throughout the field. Soybean IDC severity is made worse in cool, wet soils and soils with high residual nitrate-N. Soil pH alone is not a good indicator of soybean IDC risk because some high pH soils lack high carbonate and salinity, which are the two principal risk factors.
Guidelines for managing soybean IDC
- Soil test each field, zone, or grid for soil carbonate and salinity. This may require soil sampling prior to soybean (possibly outside of your usual soil sampling rotation), or consult previous soil test records.
- Plant soybean in fields with low carbonate and salinity (principal soybean IDC risk factors).
- Choose an IDC tolerant soybean variety on fields with moderate to high carbonate and salinity. This is your most practical option to reduce soybean IDC risk. Consult seed dealers, university soybean IDC ratings, and neighbor experiences when searching for IDC tolerant soybean varieties.
- Plant soybean in wider rows. Soybean IDC tends to be less severe in wide-row spacings (more plants per row, plants are closer together) than narrow-row spacings or solid-seeded spacings.
- Apply chelated iron fertilizer (high-quality FeEDDHA or FeHBED) in-furrow at planting. In-furrow iron fertilizer application may not be enough to help an IDC susceptible variety in high IDC risk soils (see points #2 and #3).
- Avoid planting soybean on soils with very high IDC risk.
Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN)
Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the #1 pathogen causing soybean yield loss in the United States. It is a microscopic parasitic worm that lives in soil and attacks the roots of susceptible soybean and dry bean varieties. Soybean cyst nematode is found across the soybean-growing regions of the United States; it first reached Manitoba in 2019.
Soybean cyst nematode is best managed with crop rotation and SCN-resistant soybean varieties. Soil sampling for SCN is your best tool to learn if you have SCN and also if the SCN resistance traits in your soybean varieties are still working. In recent years, AGVISE Laboratories has documented failing SCN control with PI8878 resistance (most common type) and a continuing increase in SCN egg counts across the region. In some places, the SCN egg counts are so high that no soybean crop (resistant or not) should be planted for multiple years. Once you have it, SCN is nearly impossible to eliminate from fields. A current SCN soil sample will help you choose the right SCN-resistant soybean variety and manage SCN populations now and into the future.
Troubleshooting Problems with Plant Analysis
in Nitrogen, Sulfur, Troubleshooting/by John BrekerA green growing crop is a delightful sight, and it is used by many people as an indicator of crop nutrient status. If you have fields with some yellow areas or slow growth, these symptoms may indicate a nutrient deficiency. Most commonly, yellow-looking plants may be deficient in nitrogen, sulfur, or both. If detected early, there may still be time for rescue treatment.
Plant analysis is not a magic or foolproof tool, but it can provide useful information in diagnosing problems when combined with soil analysis and good field scouting. During the summer, our technical staff receives many questions from agronomists, crop consultants, and farmers on troubleshooting problems in their fields. The following tips and tricks will help you identify potential nutrient deficiencies early.
Troubleshooting nutrient deficiencies based on visual symptoms can be difficult if symptoms look similar (yellow for nitrogen and sulfur deficiency in the early season) or indistinct (slow growth for phosphorus deficiency). Proper troubleshooting requires you to collect paired plant and soil samples from the area with poor plant growth and an adjacent area with good plant growth. A single plant sample from the poor area is seldom enough information to accurately identify the nutrient deficiency. A soil sample from the same area is needed to determine if the soil nutrient supply is truly lacking or if reduced plant nutrient uptake is caused by another factor (e.g., soil saturation, soil compaction, cool temperature, disease).
With paired plant and soil samples from both good and bad areas, you can compare the results and determine if the symptoms are caused by one or more nutrients or non-soil issues. This comparison is particularly important for secondary and micronutrients that may also reduce plant uptake of other nutrients such as nitrogen, which could otherwise misidentify the deficiency and lead to the wrong corrective treatment (a common problem when only one plant sample is collected). Plant and soil samples should be collected within 7-10 days of symptom development to identify the nutrient deficiency and to have enough time for a rescue fertilizer application if possible. Plant samples collected after this window may be suspect as other issues may develop and confound the results.
The picture below shows patchy yellowing in a spring wheat field during tillering stage. Plant and soil samples (good and bad) determined that sulfur was deficient in yellow areas, and the grower still had options for applying sulfur fertilizer to correct the deficiency. This is a great example of paired plant and soil analysis helping the farmer choose the right corrective action, rather than blindly putting more nitrogen on yellow wheat.
Yellow wheat showing potential sulfur deficiency (upper leaves yellowing first), but there might be soil nitrogen losses too. A paired plant and soil sample is the best way to decide the right corrective action.
Collecting plant and soil samples for troubleshooting nutrient deficiencies:
If you have fields with areas of poor plant growth, now is the time to collect plant and soil samples to determine if a nutrient deficiency is the issue. The troubleshooting procedure outlined above will help you detect nutrient deficiencies early and decide upon the proper corrective action if needed. To learn more about proper plant and soil sample collection and interpreting reports, please see the resources below.
Plant Analysis Guides
Plant Sampling Guide
Interpreting Plant Analysis Reports
Soil Analysis Guides
Soil Sampling Guide
Interpreting Soil Test Reports
Early Summer Grid Soil Sampling
in Precision Ag/by Brent JaenischThe interest in early summer topsoil grid sampling (1.0- to 2.5-acres per grid) continues to increase, especially in traditional corn-soybean growing areas. In Minnesota alone, 30-40% of all grid soil samples are now collected in the summer months. The early summer period (late May to late June) is an excellent period of time to collect grid soil samples, instead of waiting until after soybean harvest when workload and time constraints are heavier.
These early summer soil samples are collected from unfertilized soybean fields, and the soil samples are collected when the soybean plants are in early vegetative growth stages while you can travel across soybean fields with ATVs or UTVs without causing unnecessary damage. These are fields that would have been fertilized two years prior ahead of corn planting, and the fertilizer rates were high enough to cover the following soybean crop as well.
The early summer timeframe works well for 0-6 inch soil sampling and analyzing non-mobile nutrients and soil properties. The commonly tested nutrients and soil properties are P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, pH, buffer pH, salts, organic matter, carbonate (CCE), CEC, and base saturation. It is not applicable for 2-ft residual nitrate-N testing, which must wait until after the crop has been harvested. The mobile soil nutrients like nitrate-N, sulfate-S, and chloride should wait for fall soil sampling.
Advantages to early summer grid soil sampling
You will want to avoid soybean fields that have been fertilized or manured in the fall or spring prior, as the recent fertilizer or manure application can skew soil test results. In these situations, it is best to wait until after the soybean crop has been harvested to collect soil samples in the fall. In small grain production areas, if soybean or pulses will be planted next year (both crops not requiring nitrogen fertilizer), the early summer timeframe can also offer another opportunity to accomplish grid/zone sampling in the early vegetative growth stages of the small grain crop (barley, oat, wheat), just make sure to avoid any fertilizer bands (seed-row or mid-row fertilizer bands).
Protecting Spring-Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer from Ammonia Volatilization
in Fertilizer Placement, Nitrogen/by John BrekerAs the spring planting season gets underway, agronomists and farmers are asking about the best ways to protect spring-applied nitrogen. How much nitrogen might I lose if I cannot incorporate it? Does vertical tillage incorporate fertilizer enough? We have compiled some resources to help answer those questions.
There are three ways to lose nitrogen fertilizer: ammonia volatilization, denitrification, and nitrate leaching. In excessively wet soils, nitrogen can be lost through nitrate leaching and denitrification. However, for spring-applied nitrogen, ammonia volatilization is the main concern with dry soil conditions and unpredictable precipitation forecasts.
When you apply ammoniacal fertilizers (e.g. anhydrous ammonia, urea, UAN, ammonium sulfate) to the soil surface without sufficient incorporation, some amount of free ammonia (NH3) can escape to the atmosphere. Sufficient incorporation with tillage or precipitation is needed to safely protect that nitrogen investment below the soil surface.
Ammonia volatilization risk depends on soil and environmental factors (Table 1) and the nitrogen fertilizer source (Table 2). Typically, we are most concerned about ammonia volatilization for surface-applied urea or UAN. It is not easy to estimate how much nitrogen might be lost, and sometimes the losses can be substantial. Although you cannot change the soil type or weather forecast, you do have control over the nitrogen source and application method (Table 2) to protect your nitrogen investment.
Practices to reduce ammonia volatilization for urea or UAN, in order of most effective practice
These practices should also be considered if you will be applying in-season nitrogen fertilizer later in the summer. It is always best to apply nitrogen below the soil surface, such as injected anhydrous ammonia or coulter-injected UAN, to protect nitrogen fertilizer. For surface-applied urea or UAN, you should time the fertilizer application just before a rainfall or consider NBPT to extend the rainfall window.
The higher ammonia loss potential for ammonium sulfate (Table 2) often surprises people (and we get questions about it). On calcareous soils with high pH, the initial reaction products of ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) can produce free ammonia, which may be lost if ammonium sulfate is lying on the soil surface. This is a similar reaction process to free ammonia formation with diammonium phosphate (DAP, 18-46-0) applied to calcareous soils. This is why AMS and DAP are not suggested as seed-placed fertilizers on calcareous soils because of the ammonia toxicity risk to seedlings. Please note that urease inhibitors like NBPT will not protect ammonium sulfate from ammonia volatilization.
Helpful resources
Nitrogen extenders and additives for field crops (NDSU) https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/nitrogen-extenders-and-additives-for-field-crops
Should you add inhibitors to your sidedress nitrogen application? (Univ. Minnesota) https://blog-crop-news.extension.umn.edu/2020/06/should-you-add-inhibitors-to-your.html
Split the risk with in-season nitrogen (AGVISE Laboratories) https://www.agvise.com/split-the-risk-with-in-season-nitrogen/
Switching More Acres to Soybean?
in Disease, Iron, Phosphorus, Potassium, Soybean/by John BrekerThe spike in nitrogen fertilizer prices over the past month has prompted many growers to think about switching more acres to soybean in 2026. The high nitrogen fertilizer prices are squeezing the potential profitability of any crop requiring nitrogen fertilizer, such as corn, dry bean, canola, or wheat. The symbiotic nitrogen fixing behavior of soybean is an impressive feat of nature that helps reduce nitrogen fertilizer expenses in farm budgets.
If you do plan to plant more soybean acres in 2026, remember that soybean still has its own crop nutrient needs and removal, like phosphorus and potassium, that cannot be ignored for the soybean crop or across the crop rotation. In addition, iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a common problem in soybean fields across the region, and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) can debilitate and cripple soybean yield now and into the future.
Before you plant soybean on any acre, it is important to have current soil test information for IDC and SCN. These two problems are best managed with the right soybean variety, and there is a nice window before spring planting to collect soil samples.
Soybean Fertility (Phosphorus and Potassium)
Soybean does not respond to phosphorus as dramatically as grass crops like corn or wheat do. Nevertheless, medium to high soil test P is required to achieve good soybean yields. Soybean responds to broadcast P placement better than seed-placed P or sideband P. In no-till regions where soybean is often planted with air drills, seed-placed P or sideband P is often the only opportunity to apply phosphorus in the system. You must pay special attention to seed-placed fertilizer safety with soybean.
Soybean removes far more potassium in harvested seed than canola or wheat. Soybean yielding 50 bu/acre removes about 60 lb/acre K2O, while wheat yielding 80 bu/acre removes only 25 lb/acre K2O. Pay close attention to potassium removal across the crop rotation. After soybean is added to the crop rotation, cumulative crop K removal over numerous years increases greatly, and declining soil test K is observed over time.
Do not place potassium fertilizer with soybean seed; delayed seedling emergence and reduced plant population can occur. Any potassium fertilizer should be broadcasted or banded away from seed.
Soybean Iron Deficiency Chlorosis (IDC)
Soybean is very susceptible to iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC). Soybean IDC is not caused by low soil iron but instead by soil conditions that decrease iron availability and uptake by soybean roots. Soybean IDC risk and severity are primarily related to soil carbonate content (calcium carbonate equivalent, CCE) and worsened by salinity (electrical conductivity, EC). These primary risk factors (carbonate and salinity) can be measured with routine soil testing.
Soybean IDC is common in the upper Midwest, northern Great Plains, and Canadian Prairies, where soils frequently have high carbonate and/or salinity. Within a field, IDC symptoms are usually confined to soybean IDC hotspots with high carbonate and salinity; however, symptoms may appear across a field if high carbonate and salinity are present throughout the field. Soybean IDC severity is made worse in cool, wet soils and soils with high residual nitrate-N. Soil pH alone is not a good indicator of soybean IDC risk because some high pH soils lack high carbonate and salinity, which are the two principal risk factors.
Guidelines for managing soybean IDC
Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN)
Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the #1 pathogen causing soybean yield loss in the United States. It is a microscopic parasitic worm that lives in soil and attacks the roots of susceptible soybean and dry bean varieties. Soybean cyst nematode is found across the soybean-growing regions of the United States; it first reached Manitoba in 2019.
Soybean cyst nematode is best managed with crop rotation and SCN-resistant soybean varieties. Soil sampling for SCN is your best tool to learn if you have SCN and also if the SCN resistance traits in your soybean varieties are still working. In recent years, AGVISE Laboratories has documented failing SCN control with PI8878 resistance (most common type) and a continuing increase in SCN egg counts across the region. In some places, the SCN egg counts are so high that no soybean crop (resistant or not) should be planted for multiple years. Once you have it, SCN is nearly impossible to eliminate from fields. A current SCN soil sample will help you choose the right SCN-resistant soybean variety and manage SCN populations now and into the future.
USDA-NRCS CEMA 216: A Cost-sharing Program for Soil Health Testing
in Soil Biological Analysis, Soil Health, Soil Physical Analysis/by John BrekerSoil health assessment includes more than traditional soil fertility analysis. Soil health encompasses physical, chemical, and biological soil properties, which all come together to provide a healthy, living soil for optimal plant growth. Traditional soil fertility analysis, supported with university research, is still the approved practice for assessing plant nutrient requirements and determining fertilizer rates. Yet, soil health assessment can complement your knowledge and practices to improve soil management.
In January 2026, the USDA-NRCS released an update to Conservation Evaluation and Monitoring Activity (CEMA) 216 – Soil Health Testing. The CEMA 216 program has special soil health testing requirements that AGVISE Laboratories is able and prepared to provide to our clients. The CEMA 216 program focuses on five core soil health measurements and requires water-stable aggregate (WSA) classes, total organic carbon, permanganate-oxidizable carbon (POXC), 24-h CO2 respiration, autoclave citrate-extractable (ACE) protein, soil pH, and soil texture. We have created a soil test package called Option SH216 to meet these requirements. The soil sample collection also requires special instructions and submission forms, which you can find at Resources >> Submission Forms. If you have any questions about soil sample collection and submission for CEMA 216, please contact AGVISE before you collect or ship the soil samples.
Contact your local USDA-NRCS office for more details on CEMA 216, program eligibility, and sign-ups. AGVISE Laboratories also meets the CEMA 216 requirement to choose a laboratory approved through the Performance Assessment Program (PAP) of the North American Proficiency Testing (NAPT) Program.
Phosphorus Fertilizer Forms: Orthophosphate or Polyphosphate (Ortho-P or Poly-P)
in Phosphorus, Starter Fertilizer/by John BrekerThis article originally appeared in the AGVISE Laboratories Spring 2024 Newsletter.
Each spring, we get questions about what form of phosphate fertilizer is better. The debate over orthophosphate and polyphosphate has raged for decades. Just when we think we have put the issue to bed, it comes up again! These questions originate from the simple fact that orthophosphate (ortho-P) is the form that plant roots are able to uptake. This simple fact, however, is a simplistic understanding of phosphorus fertilizer forms and chemistry in soil. The truth is either form of phosphate fertilizer form (ortho-P or poly-P) will provide the same crop yield response when applied at the same rate of phosphorus. With “new” fertilizer products and additives on the market, it is time to revisit the basics of phosphorus fertilizer materials and their behavior in soil.
All dry phosphate fertilizers are orthophosphate forms; this includes monoammonium phosphate (MAP, 11-52-0), diammonium phosphate (18-46-0), and triple superphosphate (TSP, 0-46-0). Yes, this means that all dry phosphate fertilizers are orthophosphate forms. Liquid phosphate fertilizers are usually some blend of orthophosphate and polyphosphate of varying proportions. There are pure liquid ortho-P fertilizers available, but the liquid poly-P fertilizers will also contain some smaller proportion of ortho-P in solution too. Either way, all phosphorus fertilizer materials, dry or liquid, ortho-P or poly-P, will act the same once applied to soil.
In fertilizer manufacturing, all products start as phosphoric acid derived from rock phosphate. You could use liquid phosphoric acid as a phosphorus fertilizer material itself, but it is corrosive and difficult to handle. The next step is converting phosphoric acid to a more stable product that is easier to handle. If you want to make a high concentration liquid phosphorus fertilizer, you must also remove some water from the phosphoric acidic. The dehydration process (removal of water) produces linked chains of orthophosphate, which are called polyphosphate chains, resulting in a denser and more concentrated liquid phosphate material. The name “polyphosphate” literally means “many phosphate.” The dehydration process is never 100% efficient, so some orthophosphate always remains in solution. In most polyphosphate fertilizers, like 10-34-0, the breakdown is around 75% polyphosphate and 25% orthophosphate. This results in a higher concentration liquid phosphorus fertilizer with more pounds of phosphorus per gallon, meaning that you have to haul less material to the field to achieve the same phosphorus rate.
As a fertilizer applied to soil, does this mean polyphosphate is less available than orthophosphate to plant roots? When polyphosphate is applied to soil, the fertilizer reacts quickly with water in soil and breaks into orthophosphate again. The “many phosphate” becomes normal orthophosphate again, and the rehydration step is very fast. Even at cool soil temperatures (40 deg F), over 40% of polyphosphate converts to orthophosphate within 72 hours. Within one to two weeks, the conversion is complete, leaving all plant-available orthophosphate for crop uptake.
In the end, it all comes back to crop yield, right? In studies across the Midwest, Great Plains, and Canadian Prairies, the performance of orthophosphate and polyphosphate have been equal, as long as you apply the same rate of phosphorus. As stated earlier, all phosphorus fertilizer materials, dry or liquid, ortho-P or poly-P, will act the same once applied to soil.
BONUS A unique property of ammonium polyphosphate (APP, 10-34-0) is the ability to chelate or sequester metal cations, such as micronutrients like zinc, in the polyphosphate molecule. This allows polyphosphate solutions to maintain a higher concentration of micronutrients in solution than pure orthophosphate. Ammonium polyphosphate can maintain 2% Zn in solution, compared to only 0.05% Zn with pure orthophosphate.
Fall-applied Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Couple Simple Rules
in Fertilizer Placement, Nitrogen/by John BrekerThis article is shared annually to help answer frequently asked questions about nitrogen fertilizer applications and nitrogen losses in the fall.
October is here, and many people are preparing for fall nitrogen fertilizer applications. Before you hit the field, we want to share these important reminders about fall nitrogen application timing and placement to help you reduce potential soil nitrogen losses through fall and winter.
It is important to wait until soil temperatures reach 50 °F (10 °C) before applying fall nitrogen to reduce the risk of soil nitrogen loss. Once nitrogen fertilizer is applied, soil microbes begin converting ammonium-nitrogen (NH4+) to nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-), a process called nitrification. In the nitrate form, nitrogen is vulnerable to loss through nitrate leaching or denitrification. Soil temperatures cooler than 50 °F help slow microbial activity and keep nitrogen in the safer ammonium-nitrogen form longer. This applies to any ammoniacal nitrogen fertilizer source, which includes anhydrous ammonia, urea, UAN, and ammonium sulfate.
Quick rules for fall-applied nitrogen timing
Soil temperature map from the North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network (NDAWN) from 21 September 2025. You can find an updated daily soil temperature map at the NDAWN website.
It is a good idea to keep a soil thermometer with you to measure the current soil temperature in the field. In addition to NDAWN, a number of regional climate mesonets have online tools to search for local and regional soil temperatures.
The 50 °F soil temperature rule of thumb is particularly important for soils prone to nitrogen loss: well-drained, coarse-textured soils are prone to nitrate leaching and poorly-drained, fine-textured soils are prone to denitrification. If such soils receive excess precipitation or become saturated (waterlogged) through fall or spring, soil nitrate can be lost through leaching or denitrification. In general, it might be better to apply nitrogen fertilizer on such soils in spring. But, if you must apply nitrogen fertilizer in the fall, make sure you wait until soil temperatures are cold enough to keep it in the ammonium-nitrogen form for a longer period of time to reduce potential soil nitrogen losses.
For fall-applied nitrogen, subsurface banding or incorporation is also important to reduce ammonia volatilization, another potential nitrogen loss mechanism. Fall precipitation (rain or snow) is often too sporadic and unreliable to be considered an effective incorporation “strategy” for broadcast applications. Fall-applied urea should be banded below the soil surface (3 inches or deeper) or incorporated with tillage (at least 3-4 inches) to ensure complete coverage.
Shallow fertilizer bands or shallow incorporation with vertical tillage does not provide adequate soil coverage to prevent ammonia volatilization. If soils are very dry, successful incorporation may not be possible because tillage can produce large, uneven clods that leave nitrogen fertilizer exposed to the atmosphere and vulnerable to ammonia volatilization. Although dry soil poses a lower risk of ammonia volatilization than moist soil, soil moisture is not the only factor that contributes to ammonia volatilization risk (Table 1).
Fall-applied anhydrous ammonia should be banded 5 to 6 inches deep. Ensure that anhydrous ammonia trenches are sealing properly to prevent gaseous ammonia losses from the trench. In addition, the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin (brand name N-Serve) can be added to anhydrous ammonia to slow nitrification, offering additional insurance to keep nitrogen in the safer ammonium-nitrogen form for longer. Nitrapyrin is also available in formulations for dry and liquid nitrogen products. Please note that nitrapyrin degrades faster and loses its effectiveness at warmer soil temperatures, so it is no substitute for cooler soil temperatures (<50 °F).
Fall-applied nitrogen is a convenient way to allocate time and labor resources, leaving one less thing to do in the spring. But, you must be smart and consider fertilizer source, timing, and placement options to make sure that the nitrogen applied in the fall will still be there next spring. With fertilizer prices still remaining high, now is not the time to risk soil and fertilizer nitrogen loss.
Sodic Soil Problems? Try the NDSU Gypsum Requirement Calculator
in Saline and Sodic Soil, Soil Amendment/by John BrekerThis article originally appeared in the AGVISE Laboratories Spring 2025 Newsletter.
Salinity and sodicity are two related but distinct terms to describe salt-affected soils. Salinity is the overall abundance of soluble salts, which compete with plant water uptake and reduce crop productivity. Salinity is measured as soluble salts (mmhos/cm or dS/m) on soil test reports. Sodicity specifically refers to high sodium in soil that destroys soil structure, resulting in poor water movement, poor trafficability, and soil compaction. Sodicity is measured as extractable sodium percentage (%Na) or sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) on soil test reports.
Saline soils have an overall abundance of soluble salts, which must be managed with salt-tolerant plant species or improved soil water management (tile drainage). There is nothing you can add to make the salts disappear, such as the mistaken suggestion to apply gypsum to saline soils. Gypsum, however, can be an effective amendment for sodic soils (those with low salinity yet high sodium). A soluble calcium source, like gypsum, can help reduce soil swelling and dispersion and help improve soil structure and water movement on troublesome sodic soils.
The amount of gypsum required is often in tons per acre. This is no task accomplished with a few hundred pounds of gypsum. To calculate the amount of gypsum needed, North Dakota State University has released a gypsum requirement calculator, available online: https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/soils/GypsumRequirementWebApp/ The calculator will ask for the soil depth to amend, soil bulk density, CEC, gypsum purity, and initial/target SAR values.
AGVISE Demonstration Project: Lowering Soil pH with Elemental Sulfur
in Research, Soil Amendment, Soil pH, Sulfur/by John BrekerThis article originally appeared in the AGVISE Laboratories Spring 2025 Newsletter.
There may not be silly questions, but there are silly answers. Every so often, we get questions about unusual solutions to manage calcareous soils in the northern Great Plains and Canadian Prairies. The most frequent oddball “solutions” involve lowering soil pH with elemental sulfur on calcareous soils. Such suggestions might work on acidic soils; however, the dominant calcareous soils in the region have high pH (>7.3) and tons of natural calcium carbonate that make such attempts impractical and expensive. To put the nail in the coffin, AGVISE Laboratories started some long-term demonstration projects to show plainly why such ideas do not work or may cost way too much!
If possible, we’d like an easy and cheap solution to lower soil pH, like applying only 100 to 200 lb/acre elemental sulfur (S). In soil, elemental S oxidizes to sulfuric acid, which can lower soil pH. However, the large amount of calcium carbonate (free lime) keeps our soils buffered at high pH. To lower soil pH permanently, you must first react and neutralize the carbonate with elemental S before the soil pH can budge. With 100 lb/acre elemental S applied each year, that does not sound too difficult, right?
Elemental sulfur project with rates ranging from 0 to 40,000 lb/acre elemental sulfur. Can you identify the 20 ton/acre rate?
Not so fast. A soil with only 1% calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) takes 3.2 ton/acre elemental S (6,400 lb/acre) to neutralize the carbonate alone in the 0-6 inch soil depth. In 2020, we started an elemental S project at Northwood, ND on soil containing 4.5% CCE, which would require literal tons of elemental S to lower soil pH. A previous project started in 2005 had used 10,000 lb/acre elemental S, but it was not enough to lower soil pH beyond pH 7.8 after 15 years. This time, we decided to get serious and use elemental S rates from 0 to 40,000 lb/acre (Figure 1). The elemental S rates were intended to hit above and below the target 30,000 lb/acre elemental S rate required to react and neutralize 4.5% CCE.
For the first three years of the project, we saw little to no change in soil pH, regardless of elemental S rate. The oxidation process that converts elemental S to sulfuric acid is a slow, biological process that can take a long time. In Fall 2024, we finally saw real changes in soil pH following elemental S application. The 16,000 lb/acre elemental sulfur rate reached pH 7.5. The 24,000 lb/acre elemental sulfur rate reached pH 7.0. The 40,000 lb/acre elemental sulfur rate reached pH 6.0, a dramatic change! The lowest 8,000 lb/acre elemental sulfur rate, however, was no different than the control.
Start Strong, Finish Strong with Starter Phosphorus
in Corn, Phosphorus, Starter Fertilizer/by Brent JaenischThis article originally appeared in the AGVISE Laboratories Spring 2025 Newsletter.
Cool and wet soil conditions can limit root growth and phosphorus uptake during the early growing growing season. This is why starter phosphorus placed with or near the seed can be so effective in enhancing early plant growth and development. In small grains, starter phosphorus helps improve tiller initiation, even on soil with high soil test P. Faster development in spring can also help flowering wheat or canola beat the summer heat, or advance the corn silking date and maturity to help save grain drying expenses in fall.
Starter phosphorus increased early corn plant biomass (growth stage V5) when applied as 10-34-0 with seed, with and without broadcast phosphorus fertilizer. Summarized across multiple soils with pH ranges including 6.0 to 8.5. Reference: Kaiser, D.E, and J.A. Lamb. 2023. Banding fertilizer with corn seed. UMN Ext. Circ., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. https://extension.umn.edu/crop-specific-needs/banding-fertilizer-corn-seed